🔗 Share this article

Loved ones whose relatives laid to rest in resting places at risk from coastal erosion state that indecision over how to tackle the issue is creating avoidable anguish concerning the eternal homes of their departed family.

An Impending Danger to Historic Graveyards

The council have singled out three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being at risk of being engulfed by the ocean in the coming decades.

A recent report on the issue details a range of options, from taking no action to exhuming remains and reburying them in more secure sites. Authorities maintain it is for the community to decide how to move forward.

“At the moment we’re in limbo. It upsets me. They intended this to be their last home, but it won't be because of the sea.”

Estimates suggest at least part of one graveyard could fall into the sea in the next 80 years, but some residents fear it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got under 20 years, if you look at what’s happened in the last 30 years,” one said.

Troubled by the Past

A local business owner recalled a childhood visit to the neighbouring village of Eccles, which has largely disappeared into the water, along with its place of worship and burial ground.

“It was possible to see human remains,” she said. “Some have this romantic idea that the deceased will just get washed out to the ocean. That is not the case. People will collect remains as souvenirs and go grave robbing looking for valuables. That is completely undignified.”

“I’m worried that the same thing that happened at Eccles will occur here and there’ll be bones on the beach. I’d be disgusted by that.”

A Soldier's Grave in Jeopardy

Along the shoreline lies the grave of a ex-soldier killed while serving overseas. His mother expressed she could not sleep after discovering her child's grave might one day be relocated.

“It does disturb me to consider this may not remain his permanent resting place,” she said. “For us it’s an important site to visit.”

In her view, new burials should stop but says it is too soon to disturb current plots. “What I would choose for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an early decision must be made when a critical moment has been reached.”

Seeking Solutions and Certainty

An absence of agreement over when and how to tackle the problem has left bereaved families feeling frustrated and anxious.

Some want additional coastal protections to delay the unavoidable loss and to allow burials to continue for now. Others contend the moment for moving graves is approaching.

“It is very emotive,” said one relative. “The official study was really good, but now there’s confusion about how it is taken forward. And everybody is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.”

A coastal manager confirmed the graveyards were owned and managed of the local diocese. “In the end it is up to them to decide the path to take. We are here to assist them through that process with communities.”

He added there was ample time to consider all the choices. “We are talking many years before it begins getting lost.”

“Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should be done yet. We need productive community discussions to discover the right answers for each community.”

The prospect of losing the historic sites was described as one of “immense sorrow for the area,” but church representatives also referenced a belief in life after death, providing a spiritual perspective on the temporal disappearance of sacred ground.